Do you want to learn GarageBand? Click HERE to get started (it's free)
Apogee Jam 96K Review

Apogee Jam 96K Review

Apogee Jam 96K Review
3.7
Good
Get Yours Here

The original Jam was one of a few high profile ‘breakout’ devices back in 2012 when recording on the go using your iPhone or iPad became a reality.

Positioning itself as a direct competitor to IK Multimedia’s then ubiquitous (but ultimately limited) iRig, the original Jam wowed users with it’s fantastic sound quality and stylish design.

Fast forward to present day and there’s no shortage of compact, portable interfaces on the market. Does Apogee’s updated Jam 96k do enough to separate itself from the rest?

The Jam 96k certainly makes a good first impression.

Upon opening the box, you’ll find Apogee’s redesigned unit nestled snugly in some good quality foam packaging , along with either a solitary Jam to USB cable, or USB and lightning cable, depending on which version you’ve purchased (more on this later).

 

jam-96k-mac-windows-product-tour-1

Build quality here is great – the faux metal casing coupled with the rubber at either end of the unit give it a feeling of indestructibility.

Setting up to record with the Jam96k in GarageBand is super simple. Attaching the unit with a USB connection is enough to have GarageBand prompt an input change.

Apogee have kept things simple control wise here too, with one gain control knob along with a single LED on the front of the unit which changes colour depending on how hot you dial in the gain.

There’s only one jack input and one output connection for either the provided USB cable, or – if you’ve forked out an extra $30 for the Mac & iOS version – Lightning cable.

 

jam-96k-iphone-positive-gridYou see there are a few versions of the Jam96k available; a Mac & Windows version ($99), which comes bundled with only the Jam 96k and USB cable or the Mac and iOS version ($129), which has both USB and Lightning cables.

It seems like a strange decision to make customers pay an extra $30 for a Lightning connector, especially as many of the Jam 96k’s competitors come with a variety of cables as standard – at much lower prices.

So what exactly are you spending all that extra cash on?

Things make a bit more sense once you plug in and start recording.

Apogee have upgraded the Jam 96k’s circuit design over the original version. Couple that with the complete lack of latency and higher sample rate recording available and it’s surprising just how good your recordings can sound.

I experienced a crystal clear signal through the entirety of my time using the Jam 96k. Clean tones sounded crisp, while more driven tones came through loud and clear, without any muddiness.

 

The sound clip below was recorded by Silvertide guitarist Nick Perri, using the Apogee Jam96k into an iPhone running GarageBand iOS:

 

There’s no denying the Jam 96k sounds fantastic, but how does it measure up against it’s competitors?

IK Multimedia recently released a firmware update for it’s iRig HD guitar interface, allowing it to record  24bit/96kHz audio. Considering that the iRig HD is considerably cheaper than the Jam 96k, you would expect a very noticeable difference in audio quality…

Right?

 

I put together a Sound Quality Face Off comparison video to find out how the two interfaces compare.

 

 

The Verdict

Apogee Jam 96K Review
Conclusion
The Apogee Jam 96k sounds fantastic. The redesigned electronics and added kHz really make your recordings pop, but it struggles to justify it's hefty price tag when compared to cheaper alternatives.
Positives
Sounds Great
Sleek Design
Super Portable
Negatives
Expensive
Not Exactly Ground Breaking
3.7
Good
Get Yours Here

Show Comments (5)
  1. I realize that you are comparing two “play as you go” devices for the portable guitar playing, primarily hobbiest, but if I may offer an opinion here about use case and getting what you pay for.

    I realize that the “economy of scale” in price comes into play here so the higher price tag of an Audient14 although significant, I think the question has to be asked “what do you want to use an interface for?”

    If you just want to jam into an iPad or GB and never want to record with a mic. If you want something you can throw easily into you bag and run with it, then sure, don’t spend more money than you need to. I totally get that!

    But if you seriously want to record into GB or other DAW and you need mic pres, then the additional $100 USD (street price) for the AD14 provides truly transparent jfet input, two professional class mic inputs and far more control over the process. At that price point I believe you are getting far more for your money and an interface that is truly spectacular in sonic quality.

    No I don’t work for Audient or have any financial relationship other than owning one and using it on an ongoing basis.

    Thank you Patrick for your time to review these other units and your contribution to the GB using community.

    1. Unfortunately, the Audient ID14’s main stand out feature – ScrollControl – isn’t supported in GarageBand, so I wouldn’t recommend it as an alternative interface. Instead i’d suggest maybe checking out Focusrite’s Scarlett series of interfaces for class leading pre amp quality.

  2. Ok, sure the scroll wheel is not compatible with GB but I would not say it was it’s main feature.

    If you A/B the mike pres, compare the Burr-brown A/D converters and your take into account the very well designed jfet line level input, the Focusrite, in my opinion is not as stellar in audio quality.

    Try recording “nothing” with the gains up and you can easily hear that the noise floor is lower with the Audient.

    But I applaud the right to each’s own opinion on sonic quality. I say go with what works for you, but I personally was amazed at the sonic quality of the Audient. This is why I contributed my opinion.

    Cheers!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.